In order to select the best employee in an organization multitude factors are taken into account
as age
skill, academic qualification, expertise by the employer
It is suggested that the priority should be given to personal factors
of educational background and experience. I strongly oppose
as each and every factor has its own importance
So, a balance should be maintained
of prioritization.
with, only personal factors cannot showcase the overall potential of a candidate. To cite an example
a candidate applying as a software engineer is good looking and have effective communication skill but does not have a relevant academic qualification is totally unsuitable for
because he does not go through with all the phases and terms related to the designation
, personal qualities cannot guarantee that an employee has knowledge related to all aspects of the
, taking these factors as preference cannot be fruitful for the entire growth of an organization
Elaborating
,
and experience are the two fundamental aspects and most of the selection is done on
of these. The reason for
is that
reflects the knowledge of
,
only
cannot act as tool to judge the key and the best human resource
, if an applicant gives an interview for
with MBA degree
but totally ignorant with effective communication skills and does not represent the conduct and essential requirement of
duties cannot be hired as
demands strong skills in communication.
only
is not sufficient for
In conclusion
all factors have their own importance and a balancing approach should be used to select the employee because preference to single factor can hinder the main aim of
Leave a Reply