Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is argued that rich nations ought to allow greater numbers of forced migrants past their

borders and give them humanitarian relief.

This

essay totally agrees with

this

opinion because it

is the morally correct thing to do, and it will

also

help their economies in the long run.

Many refugees will die or come to serious harm if they are not accepted by Western states

because they are fleeing their homelands due to war and famine, and it is

therefore

morally

imperative that they allow them in.

That is

to say that if they did not shelter and feed them,

they would be responsible for many deaths and terrible suffering.

For example

, migrants from

Syria

are

Change the verb form
is

The verb are does not seem to agree with the subject. Consider changing the verb form.

show examples

escaping a brutal war, and

this

is the reason why Germany and other European

countries have decided to grant hundreds of thousands of them asylum.

Thousands of extra people coming into a country will

also

help boost the economy.

This

is

because there will be more workers available, and they will, in turn, pay tax and

also

buy goods

and services in that country. They may need extra financial support in the beginning, but

this

will be paid back many times over if they stay and work.

For example

, millions of Vietnamese

people were forced to leave their homeland in the 1970s, and many of them have established

thriving businesses in the USA, which pay billions of dollars in tax every year.

In conclusion, refugees should be accepted with open arms by countries in the Western

Hemisphere because it is the morally right thing to do, and it will

also

benefit the host countries

monetarily in the future.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*