Some people prefer to donate native communities or directly
underprivileged people, whereas other people do
in bigger scales. Basically, each
owns benefits aims
a better society, but the
is more outstanding than the former ones.
that source of
is quantitatively limited immediately impacts the people received help. Citizens directly provide help to their local charitable organizations, but there is always
in a number of citizens who are willing to give away.
, the amount of local
is not abundant all the time.
, because of the direct giving, the residents can receive immediately the help without long time to wait that means
timely satisfies the needs of the miserable people. Canteen,
, which provides non-charged food just supplies for
of food and for
of people per day.
, national or international organizations can solve big issues: national dilemma and global headache with plentiful
. The financial source of these organizations comes from all
of the world, so it apparently is larger than the budget of local charitable entities.
, the national and international organizations concentrate on problems which are necessary to handle, affect
of the world.
, supporting for these organizations can solve the global emergency crisis that the local
cannot carry, brings positive effect to everyone on the world.
, appeal people to
financially in order to
its necessary measures.
contains distinctive subjects to affect and both methods target good results. The national or international
is still preferred because of its the possible of solutions.
Leave a Reply