In our new era, nations have been gripped by many issues, especially the education part of the
, and a lot of authorities advocate that it is better to pour more money into accessing the
for the purpose of free usage. I believe it would consider as one of the notions, and I totally agree with
statement.
There are at least two significant reasons why some people disagree with
idea.
, despite the fact that free
is appealing to everybody, allocating more budget to it means that the
may diminish the other sectors’ budget, and it would be irritating for those who do not interest in it.
, the ageing population would prefer an increase in the welfare state budget rather than the
.
, they could be mad about
decision with the
.
, they assume that there are far too many fraud men that could abuse
zero cost
for aims that are do not reconcile with the
‘s goals. Downloading movies and surfing social networks could be the best examples of
.
, I presume free
is compulsory these days to guarantee both teachers and students health. it could be wholesome for other citizens to avoid unnecessary travelling throughout the city and dispersing virus among the people, namely in crowded cities, and towns which conform fewer protocols.
,
type of
not only is perfect for students who are studying in big cities, but
it brings a unique opportunity for those studying in the countryside. Regarding its benefits,
, free-cost
contributes society to enhancing in education level.
in conclusion,
there are some people who do not support
theory, it could be wholesome for every single individual in the country. I think by finding the best solution to resolve
issue, experts could convince opponents too.
Leave a Reply