Nowadays, charter-flight has brought significant changes to our lives.
, whether the cheap
should be prohibited due to its negative impact is a controversial issue. I am of the opinion that banning low-cost airline would do more harm than good.
There are significant drawbacks associated with preventing low-price aircrafts.
of all, it is clear that
action would lead to many people will be unemployed.
means that cheap aircraft provide jobs for thousands of citizens and without them mass unemployment would be alternative.
, most of these flights are to tourism destinations, so the economics of tourist hotspots would be severely damaged.
, the income of restaurants and equipment hire business in
location would be greatly reduced and causing the destruction of the entire economy.
, the local authorities should give a priority to improve quality of charter-flight rather than prohibiting it.
is not to say that curbing low-cost airlines would not bring advantage to society. There are, of course, with the resulting reduction in flight, less airports would need to be constructed.
may be a good outcome because airports are costly for government seeing that expensive infrastructure
as roads and rail lines are required to reach them.
, Aircraft run on fossil fuels that discharge pollutants into the environment, so if a government do not enact law to ban cheap air flights, it would increase the greenhouse effect and lead to environmental contamination. But still, the cons are far greater.
In conclusion, making an effort to prohibit charter-flight will have an influence on the economic development of the country. Meanwhile, local authorities must shoulder their responsibilities to protect the environment. Only by doing so we can assure that we could hand
beautiful planet to our
generation and the
generation after.
Leave a Reply