While some people are of the view that curbing criminal activities is the sole duty of the authority, others opine that each person is responsible for their
and protection. In my opinion, the government has a greater
to keep criminal activities in check by enforcing stricter laws. Having said that, citizens
need to do whatever they can to ensure their freedom.
On the one hand, some people feel that everyone of us should take care of our
as police cannot be present everywhere at all times and
, the thefts could occur in shops. The police cannot be present there all the time to prevent
, it is the
of the shop owners to take preventive measures
as installing an alarm or placing guards outside the shop. Customers
need to take care of their belongings to ensure that they are not robbed.
measures can prevent many criminal acts from occurring.
, it is evident that each individual has a
to ensure their
, there is a limit to what a person can do on their own. Only governments can enforce strict laws to keep the
in check. Stringent laws will act as a deterrent and reduce the
to a great extent.
, in the Middle East (write: the Middle East) the punishments for each and every
are so harsh that people do not dare to break any laws;
in the Middle Eastern countries is the lowest in the world, whereas in India the
keeps on rising year after year because the laws are lenient and more often than not the criminals are let off very easily. Unfortunately,
encourages others to commit
, the state has to own up the
and enforce stern laws that will discourage people from committing crimes.
In conclusion, both the individuals and the government have the
from occurring. The government should enact stringent laws to deter people from committing crimes. At the same time, people should
do whatever they can to ensure their
Leave a Reply