There is a huge debate about what we should live for that there are
who prefer that an adult should spend
in improving their career life, while others believe that
should be spent on friends and family.
essay agrees that investing
in enhancing
career path has many advantages, and I am going to examine both sides of
argument and
will give my opinion on
matter.
On one side, there is a
that prefers to allocate their
to social activities
as gatherings, parties, and baby showers.
,
sees that it is crucial for
to take care of their social aspect.
,
argues that humans are social beings;
, the urge to connect with others is a fundamental need.
,
understands that humans have an emotional aspect that should be nourished. In fact, there is a study conducted by Harvard University that discovered that the feeling of loneliness could lead to a heart attack.
, there is a consensus that advocates the notion that an individual has to take their job seriously. The main reason why
side has
belief is that
are living in a world that governs by monetary systems.
, it is extremely important for
to earn a living to be ready for a catastrophe than reacting to it. 2008 crisis,
, many
in the US have lost their houses which led
to be homeless.
, if individuals have had a saving account that might prevent that problem.
In conclusion, I believe that both sides have merits. On balance,
, I tend to believe that an individual should allocate
to an area that would preserve a human being dignity.
is to say, that in a world that governs by materials; it is crucial for
to find ways to increase their source of income.
Leave a Reply