opinions differ as to whether or not children should be learnt
unpaid community
as a compulsory part
secondary education. I partly agree with
assertion.
, I believe that voluntary based works are inevitable for children in which make a positive responsibility during their tender age.
On the one side of the argument, there are some basic benefits of engaging in voluntary
, which make an opportunity to mingle mass people, including upscale, poor and disable children that are suffering their lives in many difficulties.
, it makes a positive creativity to help people in order to overcome the poverty in the society.
, if any people_s is helped to get over any hardship,
, it makes a strong relationship among them and at the same
, has been
rewards older citizens in the community.
but not least, spending
in activities
as football, cricket, tennis and so on creates a bilateral tie with different groups of people, even if, it is very helpful to keep their body fit.
, there are some, who argue that to have unpaid
as a part of
are some detrimental effects for individual children. The
and most factor is that children have to spend a
, which may supersede their main business of study. It goes without saying that all and sundry are not capable to engage the charity
in the
of their tender age. Needless to say that by involving extra curriculum activities, many youngsters have injured in many ways and lost their valuable parts, which killed their lives
of developing knowledge. These types of situations, people may think twice to engage any voluntary
. On the whole, helping hand for people not only consume a numerous
interlink profuse donkey situations.
In conclusion, it seems to me that to give a hand in the poor people is a noble virtue. It increases our mental horizon and creates positive things to do something in the society.
Leave a Reply