In the competitive world, traffic has become a major issue in urban areas. Few individuals opine that government should be allowed merely public
and imposed restrictions on the private mode of
while others opposed
essay will articulate both views of
argument in the following paragraphs.
On the one hand, there are numerous reasons why a majority of multitudes are not supporting private motor
. The most predominant is the time consuming which is experienced on the roads owing to the significant proportion of owned
on the highways. To explain, the young generation preferred their own
of the public in the metropolitan cities, especially in the peak hours which is the main cause of an astronomical amount of traffic.
, a headline of the famous channel BBC ( BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION) revealed that 59% of the casualties are escalated because private
is used in suburban areas.
, people are not in favour due to the detrimental consequences.
, on the other side, youngers argued that it is not a productive approach to tackle
issue. The most prominent is the loss chunk amount of money which is squandered for the private
industry. To explicate it, the masses would be unsatisfied with the implementation of
law and a terrible impact on the convenience and efficiency that can get with their own
. To cite an example, a survey was conducted by the World Health Organisation found that 30% of the masses are suffered from depression in 2011 because Indian legal authorities implemented laws limiting the percentage of private
in the inner-city. So,
is not an effective method for alleviating the traffic issue.
there may be some benefits to prohibiting the movement owned
in the centre of the city but advantages of private
cannot be underestimated because of time-saving and flexibility.
Leave a Reply