Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child_s development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

The argument over whether learning at

or at

is better for

has not been settled yet. Whereas

education offers better protection with individual learning and opportunities for families to bond,

have a superior range of material and human resources. Ultimately, I think the

experience is best for

.

There are several advantages for

who learn at

.

, they can spend more time with their parents and siblings. Many social problems are associated with families not spending enough quality time together. Teaching

at

provides them with an individualised learning environment. Instruction is

and moves at the child_s own pace and in accordance with his or her individual learning style.

,

protects

from bullies and others who might be a bad influence.

, the

environment

offers advantages for

.

encourage

to socialise with their peers and learn how to cope with gossip, bullying and peer pressure.

,

will receive better tuition across a range of disciplines, as

have teachers who are trained in special subjects. What is more,

provide better access to physical resources

as sports equipment, musical instruments and library books.

I believe that

are better off in a

environment.

family time and individual learning are important, the range of expertise and resources that

offer cannot be matched in the

.

environments may present difficult social situations, but so too does the real world and

must learn to navigate these on their own.