Some people believe that modern games do not develop skill in children.However traditional games developed skills in childhood.To what extent do you agree or disagree.

Individuals argue that outside

played by the prior generation perform a better role in advancing

_s abilities than

electronic ones do. I partially agree with

, because

outside playing can improve physics and sociability, in-home playing can boost creativity.

with, the main reason why I believe that the

nowadays do not advance some of the

_s skills is due to their lack of mobility and,

, physical activities. As they normally need to be attached

a device, kids spend most of their time in front of a TV,

of running or jumping which are important in developing physical balance whilst growing.

, kids who jump rope are more likely to be athletic in

than those who do not.

Another reason to justify

notion is the role that most traditional

performs in increasing

_s interaction. To illustrate

, musical chairs and hide-and-seek needs several people to be fun.

, the latter

demands strategy from the players to not be found, so creating a plan with peers can help in maintaining an interesting game.

, the current

have an advance that

to be pointed. Several electronic

creativity to solve the issue, as they usually have a history telling between phases that needs the player attention to catch important

which can be used during.

,

and being creative is

a required task and which is worked.

To conclude, I somewhat agree with the trend that

_s

played prior to the ones developed currently are better to improve physical and social skills in infancy.

,

modern

can improve imagination.