Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

Today, the harmful effects of smoking on direct smokers and passive ones who breathe cigarette smoke are well-discussed. Many

countries

have enacted

laws

to forbid smoking in public places while others do not tend to follow. In

this

essay, both sides of the discussion will be debated and reach a conclusion.

On the one hand,

countries

that oppose enacting

laws

against smoking have got a dependent economy on importing or exporting

tobacco

-based

products

and cite that

such

products

could greatly influence their economic conditions. Critics of passing

laws

against smoking point to evidence from

countries

such

as Afghanistan in which the economy is massively supported by exporting opium annually. They claim that if the state warned people about the harmful effects of smoking on the health system and incremented the taxation of

tobacco

products

,

this

would be sufficient prohibitive to their consumption and address the need to restrict smoking rules.

However

, those who support enacting

laws

on smoking

tobacco

promote the idea that smoking would have harmful impacts on the health system. So far, many papers have been published in high-impact journals highlighting how smoking would impose irrecoverable damage to infants, pregnant women, and children leading to the development of cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, and autoimmune diseases.

Furthermore

, proponents of limiting rules for

the

Correct article usage
apply

It seems that there is an article usage problem here.

show examples

smoking claim that employees who are addicted to

tobacco

products

should meet their needs every hour,

thus

inevitably leaving their workplace or could not efficiently concentrate on completing their duty. They are able to cite evidence from

countries

like China, where the government has set a penalty for smoking in industrial places and would sentence them if the offenders repeated.

Overall, I would tend to side with the supportive

countries

of passing

laws

against smoking

tobacco

in public places like restaurants and administrative centres. It would be a determining decision that directly influences people’s health and,

consequently

, the economy.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*