Many people use distance learning to study at home ,but some people think it cannot bring the benefit of attending collage or university. Do you agree or disagree?

Whether condemning longer in prison is the only best way to decrease

has been a popular topic recently. In

essay, the opinions on both sides will be discussed followed by my own take.

It is manifest that condemn longer can increase the

cost of

, which might indirectly reduce the

in society.

, at the beginning of the foundation of new China, the government announced a series of strict rules and

so as to embody the incorruptible part of the party. The

was very low partly because potential

feared the

. In light of

fact, it is undeniable that releasing more strict

with long prison sentences would be efficacious in abating

.

Despite the sound effect of the above method,

, it might not be the optimal one as the potential

still exist. When more and more potential

have in society but do not reveal

the public, the potential hazard will increase, and the instability will rise correspondingly. One of the suitable examples is

ancient China governed by emperors, having

society with strict

.

A plausible way to tackle

issue, from my perspective, is to improve the

of citizens. Ensuring the fundamental necessities of every individual by

may be practical and effective.

is basically because many of the

break

to just satisfy their basic needs of lives.

To conclude, I cannot deny that condemning longer is not an effective method to reduce

, but improving the wellbeing of citizens might be more reliable and more thorough.