Every country has different methods of crime dealings. It is believed by a majority of citizens that fixed
is a determined way for all types of violations.
,
treatment possesses benefits as well as downsides.
A fixed sentence or punishing criminals with no considerations offers positive points for a country_s jurisdiction. The
is that it is easier and not time-consuming in giving a sentence judgment.
, a court just quickly refers to the
to decide a penalty.
, the
of fixed
prevents public revenge so that they cannot offend criminal as they will. Another benefit is that
principle of detention could deter criminals.
, people will think twice to commit crimes because they know the consequences of the written
.
, fixed
as a legal system delivers merits in ruling criminals.
, there are
some drawbacks of
commandment. It will be unfair for people who commit a crime with different motives and scales. A case of a grandmother stealing three cocoas in Indonesia,
, was a small violence with forgivable motive. She stole those cocoa in order to buy food for her starvation. It was an injustice to punish her as severe as curators
.
, it is likely possible to cause false judgment because of the quick verdict that provided by fixed
. The case of U.S federal court issuing false victim Aarthi S. Rao in 2010 embodies
idea perfectly. Because of false judgment the victim nearly lost a half million dollar in that year.
of
,
unfortunately, the negative impacts of fixed
can be seen.
To conclude, it is clear that even though fixed sentence has positive ramifications, its applications in the courtroom may draw unfairness. A serious awareness should be taken by both
and society to deal with the negative impacts that may be drawn from
authority.
Leave a Reply