It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should focus on people in their own countries. To what extend you agree or disagree?


some people believe that governments have to give all the attention to their citizens only, I am strongly convinced that supporting


a person who lives (or is located) near another

countries should


be one of the government_s plans. Only if the governments, along with the nongovernmental organizations do their best to be a backbone for other boundary land, will we be able to make the best use of what other countries could provide us with.

On the one hand, I believe that it is vital to help our


a person who lives (or is located) near another

citizens. In most communities there are people who suffering from poverty, starvation and being homeless,

however I

Accept comma addition
however, I

think that individuals can



with the governments to diminish the number of suffering people.

For example

, in England, volunteers donate money, clothes and even food where as it seems a small help but certainly it makes a positive difference for someone living without a roof over their head.

On the other hand

, I would argue that governments have a commitment to help other countries.

For instance

, in Africa, everyday children are suffering from epidemic diseases,



countries can provide them by air with

vaccines which

Accept comma addition
vaccines, which

is an effortless help but may save a thousands of lives.

In conclusion, perhaps we cannot help all people over the

world but

Accept comma addition
world, but

I believe that we should try to give a hand to the others who beyond our borders as much as we can.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.