Globally, juvenile delinquency continues to be a pervasive issue. There is an argument, whether the
should be responsible for their
_s actions or not.
are majorly responsible for their offspring_s actions, I entirely harbour the perspective that lawbreakers would be accountable for their offences and ought to be punished.
To commence with,
should be punished if their child does any crime as there are a huge number of cases are stemming from lack of parent_s attention and love towards their
are working day and night in order to earn a luxurious livelihood for their wards, but it affects terribly on their
as it will have detrimental impacts on their cognitive development, and they would be more likely to indulge in anti-social activities.
, I still hold the firm belief that
who commit crime should
receive deserving punishments.
, when the young offenders are punished with having custody and serve community service, they would deeply understand the seriousness of their wrongdoing and feel regretful. To be precise more, by conducting punishments, young people can be well-educated about the cost of crime committing and will never repeat the same mistake in future.
will take all the blame on themselves, it will have misled impacts on their offsprings, which force them to understand that if they commit any wrong actions, it will not bother them.
, deserving punishments should be given to them to alleviate the causes of juvenile delinquency in the long run.
In conclusion, even though
are responsible for their
_s offences, the lawbreakers ought to be solely answerable for their crimes.
, I strongly believe that
should be punished according to the justice system.
Leave a Reply