Tertiary education has become a matter of concern in recent years. The issue of whether
is preferable compared to vocational courses remains a source of controversy. While there is a strong case for the latter viewpoint, I am more inclined to the view that job seekers will still be required academic degrees in the future.
On the one hand, there are various reasons why many people agree that the latter approach is conductive to a student. It stands to reason that practical skills are prioritised in the new era as they are
to almost every aspect of life.
, plumbers and electricians
a vital role whenever there is a problem
to water or electricity system. Alternatively, practical skills
as computer literacy are easy to learn in a short period of time as vocational training courses can provide its students with these
within a year.
, they can earn a lot of job opportunities after achieving license to work.
, I would advocate with those who contend that academic
would be far more important than the aforementioned pathway.
, it is fair to say that certain professions do require theoretical
only obtained through university or college programs,
to the fact that learners will have to get relevant degrees to prove themselves as qualified workers.
, any person who
or doctor must have
higher education. Another rationale would be that university education
opens the door to well-paid jobs. In others words, bachelor or master degree holders are much more welcome by employers.
practical skills benefit people as manual workers, I am more inclined to the acquisition of pure
and undergraduate study.
Leave a Reply