In order to restrict ever increasing crime rate a class of people ponder that their has to be predefined punishment based on nature of crime whereas other opine that circumstances of crime should be taken into account while deciding the punishment .Both views are discussed below before reaching to valid conclusion .

Fixing the

by looking just at type of

makes the decision making process very quick. As without wasting much time on investigating the

of

it is actually the type of

which decides

by regularizing

of

is inculcated among all categories of criminals

small or brutal ones.

Saudi Arab follows the policy of fixed sentencing. The law of country punishes the culprit of stealing an apple same as

stealing a car

of

Saudi Arab always tops the list of countries with low

rate

In admittedly

the

in which a

is committed plays a crucial role in judging the mindset of person committing

judgment made after taking into consideration the circumstances often believe to be

.

to mandatory

the idea of flexible

help preventing the

triggered culprits from facing a furious

. Above all

it is not judicial of imposing

to juvenile culprit as to

In my opinion

flexible sentencing is more humane and righteous

the circumstances while a felony occurs regulates the occurrence of

the sentencing should never be based on type of

To conclude

all criminals are to be treated equal in the eye of

though the judgment process should be active

(with

of

) rather

passive

(with

of rules deciding

.