In many countries, a small number of people extremely high salaries. Some people believe that this is good for the country, but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

A small group of

are earned extremely high salaries in many

. Some

consider that it is beneficial for the country, but others support the reverse of the idea. In my opinion, the

idea is the most pertinent for each

because

feel happier the same economic condition, and

hierarchal differentiation can lead to many problems for

.

The

who support the minority

should earn high salaries suggest that

propensity has been continued from the beginning of

and

tendency is the main component of economics.

, the main factor of salary differentiation is each individual of the

has different potential opportunities

as physical ability, mental capacity, and psychological condition.

, most principles of justice and moral norms are balanced the wealth of the community due to the potential of a person.

, many

suggest that

share resources equally between each person of

so,

is prevented hierarchical difference and polarization in the

. These unbought the main problems of each country and

in each developed

have the large majority of the middle class. I completely agree with

approach because each person should benefit from the opportunities that arise with the distribution of the existing wealth within the framework of the social welfare state system.

In conclusion, two principals have convincing arguments but, in my opinion, the most relevant for each community since individuals are happy in similar economic circumstances, and hierarchical differentiation may bring many issues for governments.