There are different opinions about investment in transportation infrastructure in various countries. Some argue that it would be indispensable to invest a large amount of money on novel railways for intercity commuting by fast
, while others like me, think it should be better
The word that doesn_t seem to fit this context. Consider replacing it with a different one.
money is utilized to boost other means of public transports which exist.
On the one hand, fast
provide better access to other cities for passengers. In fact, these
not only have cutting-edge facilities but
reach the destination very quickly,
individuals could enjoy their journey without getting tired.
, someone due to their career situations is forced to go to another city each day, so that fast
would be a good choice for them because they can come back earlier in the evening to be with their families,
they can take advantage of
type of transportation.
, it is undeniable fact that other public transport in most countries is demanded to improve. Investing in existing vehicles is likely to be more economical. In the other words with the specific budget majority of public transport could be enhanced to be used by numerous populations. In
way authorities can reuse transport devices that need money for repairing and maintenance,
it would be more sustainable.
By the way of conclusion, I believe wherever constructing new railways to use state-of-the-arts
is beneficial, investment should
conduct on available public transports. The reason behind
, the investment cost would be fewer and
, countries capital is preserved in order to be used better and bring welfare for people.
Leave a Reply