Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extend do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Some people argue that, government should spend more money on railways rather than the roadway.

This

statement is no exception and it has own advantages and disadvantages. I strongly believe that,

road

advancement commission should spend for both railways and

road

development

.

Therefore

, following essay will elaborate my viewpoints in detail and reach to a conclusion.
In order to justify my viewpoint, it can be said that

road

development

is one of the key indicators to measure the country_s growth.

For example

, developed country_s

such

and United Kingdom, United States of America and Asian Coutries roads are strong, well planned and well built while there is a less traffic can be identified.

This

will help people to go to their work

,

Accept space
,

schools and functions on time.

Moreover

, There is less opportunity to occur the accidents on roads.

On the other hand

,

railway

development

also

necessary for the country_s growth. People

also

have an opportunity to use trains other than public transport. Ever since the technology took place in the 20th century there has an immense change in the field of information technology and it is quite advantageous for the

railway

expansion.

for

Suggestion
For

example, Asian Countries like China, Singapore, and Japan are able to use electric trains and enjoy its own benefits.
From the analysis of the above arguments, it can be concluded that the authority should allocate money for

railway

and

road

development

.

This

is only possible if higher authority has right perception and perspective towards the both infrastructure

progresment

for

road

and

railway

.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*