Government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

People have different views on the subjects that the

should invest in and prioritize in order to achieve what is termed economic

. Some believe that a larger portion of

funds should be dedicated to teaching

-related. In my opinion,

plays a large role, other subjects hold merit in their own right in contributing to, and in driving, economic

and

, deserve equal

and funding.

On the one hand, public funding in

education subjects is important in driving the

of a country in many areas,

as engineering and medicine.

, developed countries

as Japan has emphasised the

education of their citizens.

strong focus has led to

learning, knowledge, and scientific research achievement, foster innovation and increases productivity, which directly contributes to the national economic growth of the nation.

,

in the teaching of

education is crucial for a country_s economic

.

, the management of a nation

determines its state of

and economic

. As

, it can be argued that curriculum subjects

as social sciences and law require as much attention and

.

, developing economies

as Indonesia and Cambodia have long experienced a history of political and social unrests and conflicts.

can largely be attributed to instability and poor management of legal, social and governmental systems.

is

to their Asian counterparts

as Singapore and Korea, where well-established and stable civil law and political institutions can be observed.

In conclusion, subjects related to the management of a nation_s economy,

as social sciences have as much impact and significance of the

and

of one_s nation and deserve as much

as

subjects.